Political Science at JAMA and NEJM

  • by: |
  • 12/13/2012
A great blog about how the so-called leading medical journals have become oped pages with footnotes... From massdevice.com Medical journals aren't what they used to be. Just ten short years ago, medical journals were places to report scientific study, interesting cases or clinical updates and reviews. They were, for the most part, about science and discovery. Now, there is a dramatic shift of scientific content in our journals to politics and policy. No where is this more evident than the much-heralded and widely read New England Journal of Medicine. (The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) is not too far behind either.) Sign up to get our free newsletters delivered straight to your inbox Are print medical journals dead? Marketing through scientific publications? As an example, I was struck by this week's New England Journal of Medicine article titles: "Use of ADHD Medication and Criminality" (an observational study) "Mammography Screening for Breast Cancer" (complete with poll) "The Future of Obamacare" (Perspective) "Lessons from Sandy" (Perspective) "Drug Policy for an Aging Population" (Perspective) "Intravenous Immune Globulin — How Does It Work?" (Review article) I decided to look just 10 short years ago and compare what article titles existed in the New England Journal of Medicine from the week of November 21, 2002. Here are the article titles from that issue: "Transient Ischemic Attacks" (Perspective) "A Controlled Trial of a Human Papillomavirus Type 16 Vaccine" "Glycoprotein-D–Adjuvant Vaccine to Prevent Genital Herpes" "Extended Transthoracic Resection Compared with Limited Transhiatal Resection for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus" "Normal Vision despite Narrowing of the Optic Canal in Fibrous Dysplasia" "Specialty of Ambulatory Care Physicians and Mortality among Elderly Patients after Myocardial Infarction" Perhaps the shift from science to politics in our major medical journals is an brief aberration, but I don't think so. I have noticed this phenomenon and expressed my concerns in 2006. The trend has only continued to grow: even our presidential candidates for the last election had postition papers published in the New England Journal of Medicine just before the election. Seriously? But the reality of politics and policy determining how medicine is practiced remains front-stage in medicine as cost and new structural concerns dominate health care. Medical questions, research and inquiry are increasingly second fiddle to health care political white papers. Adding to this lack of reporting of scientific discovery in major medical journals are the multiple rapid-fire, diverse portals for publication that exist for doctors and researchers these days thanks to the explosion of specialty publications and the Internet's impact on information delivery to doctors. As a result, there is a fierce media race underway to keep doctors eyes focused on these antiquated journals' content as doctors increasingly migrate away from print to electronic content. If a major scientific journal like the New England Journal of Medicine decides to focus on policy instead of medicine, I suppose that's okay. That is their prerogative. But perhaps now that politics and policy have grown to such an extent in a major medical journal like the New England Journal of Medicine, the editorial board of this journal (and the others of similar political bents) should consider changing their name from the New England Journal of Medicine to the New England Journal of Perspectives. At least then our young doctors of tomorrow will fully comprehend what they're getting. -Wes

Center for Medicine in the Public Interest is a nonprofit, non-partisan organization promoting innovative solutions that advance medical progress, reduce health disparities, extend life and make health care more affordable, preventive and patient-centered. CMPI also provides the public, policymakers and the media a reliable source of independent scientific analysis on issues ranging from personalized medicine, food and drug safety, health care reform and comparative effectiveness.

Blog Roll

Alliance for Patient Access Alternative Health Practice
Better Health
Biotech Blog
CA Medicine man
Cafe Pharma
Campaign for Modern Medicines
Carlat Psychiatry Blog
Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry: A Closer Look
Conservative's Forum
Club For Growth
Diabetes Mine
Disruptive Women
Doctors For Patient Care
Dr. Gov
Drug Channels
DTC Perspectives
Envisioning 2.0
FDA Law Blog
Fierce Pharma
Fresh Air Fund
Furious Seasons
Gel Health News
Hands Off My Health
Health Business Blog
Health Care BS
Health Care for All
Healthy Skepticism
Hooked: Ethics, Medicine, and Pharma
Hugh Hewitt
In the Pipeline
In Vivo
Internet Drug News
Jaz'd Healthcare
Jaz'd Pharmaceutical Industry
Jim Edwards' NRx
Kaus Files
Laffer Health Care Report
Little Green Footballs
Med Buzz
Media Research Center
More than Medicine
National Review
Neuroethics & Law
Nurses For Reform
Nurses For Reform Blog
Opinion Journal
Orange Book
Peter Rost
Pharm Aid
Pharma Blog Review
Pharma Blogsphere
Pharma Marketing Blog
Pharmacology Corner
Pharmaceutical Business Review
Piper Report
Prescription for a Cure
Public Plan Facts
Real Clear Politics
Shark Report
Shearlings Got Plowed
Taking Back America
Terra Sigillata
The Cycle
The Catalyst
The Lonely Conservative
Town Hall
Washington Monthly
World of DTC Marketing
WSJ Health Blog